Concern At Work – How To Address Work Issues

Concern At WorkIf you have a concern at work, it can be difficult to understand how best to tackle the issue. Concerns at work vary in their seriousness, but they are often stressful and challenging to deal with. However, they rarely resolve themselves so some action is usually required. The best approach varies depending on your situation and the type of problem.

In this article, we cover various ways to deal with concerns at work and give guidance on which approach is likely to be the most appropriate. We routinely help and advise people who are still employed and dealing with work issues.

If you have a concern at work, there are various ways to address the problem.

What approach you take will vary depending on the kind of problem, the type/size of business you work in, and (importantly) what you are trying to achieve.

Most people forget to think about the outcome they want to achieve.

The most common ways to tack problems at work (internally) are:

(1) Informally

  • Talk to the relevant colleague or your manager.
  • Write to the relevant colleague or your manager (usually an email).
  • Arrange an initial meeting with the relevant colleague, manager or HR.

(2) Formally

A general rule is, if you want to stay at the business, you try and resolve the issue informally and then formally (if needed) by raising a grievance.

If you want to leave the business, you start formally with “without prejudice” communications and see if you can agree on exit terms. If not, you may then continue with the more formal approach and raise a grievance. This is the typical approach if there are grounds for Constructive Dismissal.

Concern At Work – The Informal Approach

If you like your job and want to stay there, it makes sense to try and resolve issues informally (yet still professionally) in the first instance. This will (all going well) be quicker and help maintain good working relationships.

Lots of companies (particularly larger ones) have written processes on how to deal with issues. Check if these are in place and follow them, they are there for a reason.

If the informal approach does not work, you may then consider raising a formal grievance.

Concern At Work – The Formal Approach

Grievances

As touched on above, a general rule is, if you want to leave a business, start with “without prejudice” communications, and you may then decide to use a grievance depending on how the negotiation progresses (the exact tactics deployed can vary and is something an experienced professional can help with).

However, if you want to remain in the business, and the informal process has not worked, you may then decide to raise a grievance, which is often a much more formal process (as stated, check for a written internal process on how to raise a grievance.)

When raising matters formally, it is best to go into the process with an open mind, making a genuine attempt to resolve the problem. There is little downside to this approach, even if you think your grievance will not be successful, because if you are wrong on this (you will solve the issue) but if not, you will have acted appropriately and be reflected more positivity in the documents (grievance documents are often evidence in employment tribunal claims).

When raising a grievance, it is important to clearly (and succinctly) set out (1) what the problem is and (2) what you want to happen to resolve the issue. If you have relevant information supporting your position, provide it.

All too often, people raise a grievance will long narratives that are difficult to follow, and even though they produce multiple pages of text, they fail to say what is required to fix the problem or send any information in support of their position.

Without Prejudice Communications

If the without prejudice rule applies, it prevents the relevant material from being put before a court as evidence (including an employment tribunal), thus making the material “inadmissible.”

For the without prejudice rule to apply, the statement (whether made orally or in writing) must be a genuine attempt to settle an existing dispute.

The rule is in place to give parties an opportunity to resolve disputes and communicate freely on this subject.

Good practice when using the without prejudice rule is:

  • Clearly mark the communications (or say it, if done orally) as being “without prejudice.”
  • Make sure there is an existing dispute. If the other side do not think there is, they may argue the without prejudice rule does not apply.
  • Make sure there is a genuine attempt to settle.
  • Keep without prejudice communications separate from other documents. For example, do not add a without prejudice section at the end of a written grievance.

It is important to note, simply marking a document “without prejudice” does not mean the rule will apply. If the communication was not a genuine attempt to settle an existing dispute, it is likely to be admissible (meaning it can be used as evidence).

The same applies if you omit to mark a document as without prejudice, the presence or absence of the “WP” label is not determinative.

How best to use without prejudice communications is complex. If you want to negotiate an exit, it is prudent to take professional advice.

If you think there has been a Constructive Dismissal, we again suggest you take advice (the article linked above provides more information on this situation).

A general approach is to start with without prejudice communications, but if you cannot agree exit terms, or you want to progress the negotiation, you can then (separately):

  • Raise a grievance.
  • Make a data subject access request.
  • Start Early Acas Conciliation.
  • Present a claim.

Please be aware employment law claims have strict time limits (often 3 calendar months less 1 day from the act complained of). In most cases, you must complete an Early Acas Notification form within the 3 months less 1-day time limit before making an employment tribunal claim. See Employment Tribunal Time Limit Calculator for further information.

Further, waiting too long to act can prejudice Constructive Unfair Dismissal claims (see our other article on this subject for further information.)

Summary: Addressing Concerns at Work

Facing issues at work can be stressful and challenging, but it’s important to address them promptly as they rarely resolve themselves. The best approach varies depending on the nature of the problem and your desired outcome. Below, we provide guidance on different methods to handle workplace concerns effectively.

Common Work Issues

  • Changes to terms and conditions
  • Feeling pressured or bullied
  • Discrimination
  • Lack of training
  • Difficult relationships with colleagues or managers
  • Job duties and responsibilities
  • Work-related stress
  • Working hours
  • Lack of promotion
  • Organisational changes

Initial Considerations

  1. Length of Employment: Employees with over 2 years of continuous service have more protection, including eligibility to claim unfair dismissal/constructive unfair dismissal.
  2. Notice Period: Knowing your notice period helps assess your job security when raising issues.
  3. Timing: Employment law claims have strict time limits, often 3 months less 1 day from the act complained of. Acting quickly is crucial.
  4. Desired Outcome: Clarifying your ideal outcome helps determine the best approach to resolve the issue.

Approaches to Resolving Issues

Informal Approach

If you wish to remain in your job, start with informal methods:

  • Talk to the relevant colleague or manager.
  • Write to them, usually via email.
  • Arrange a meeting with your colleague, manager, or HR.

This approach is quicker and helps maintain good working relationships. Follow your company’s written processes if they exist.

Formal Approach

If informal methods fail or if you prefer to leave your job, consider formal methods:

  • Raising a Grievance: If the informal approach fails, formally raise a grievance to address the issue (preferred if you want to stay).
  • Without Prejudice Communications: Begin with “without prejudice” communications to agree on exit terms (preferred if you want to leave). If unsuccessful, proceed with raising a grievance or other formal actions.

Without Prejudice Communications

The “without prejudice” rule allows for confidential negotiations to settle disputes without the communications being admissible in court. Key points include:

  • Mark communications as “without prejudice.”
  • Ensure there is an existing dispute.
  • Genuinely attempt to settle the dispute.
  • Keep these communications separate from other documents.

If you want to leave and negotiation an exit, this is usually the preferred starting point (although exceptions do apply).

Constructive Dismissal

If you believe there has been a fundamental breach of your employment contract, seek professional advice promptly. Acting quickly is essential to preserve your constructive dismissal claim.

Additional Steps

  • Raise a Grievance
  • Make a Data Subject Access Request
  • Start Early Acas Conciliation
  • Present a Claim

Be aware of the strict time limits for employment law claims and act swiftly to protect your rights.

For more detailed guidance and assistance, seek professional advice to navigate your specific situation effectively.

Disclaimer:

This blog is for information purposes only. Nothing should be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice and nothing written should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship.

Get In Touch

Please call us on 0207 118 9218 or complete a Free Online Enquiry and we will be in touch.

“Earlier this year I had a situation where my ex employer refused to pay what was owed after leaving the employment. The sum owed was in the region of £5000 and I was recommended Blair Toner. From the very first introduction and conversation of the problem, Blair guided me through the process of ‘Small Claims’ and linked me with the necessary forms etc. After winning judgement, still no payment happened. Blair then guided me through the process of appointing Court Baliffs and that resulted in the debt being paid in full. I personally would recommend Toner Legal and in fact Blair has since sorted a similar problem my son had experienced to my son’s total satisfaction.”

Alan Edward Goodes

“I have used the services of Toner Legal on two occasions. The service offered to me by Blair Toner was reassuring and with his expertise, guided me through an unfamiliar process ensuring I was involved at each stage. While I was going through my case, he would suggest things that I could read or listen to online that could assist me. His extensive employment law knowledge is a huge resource and it meant I would get the best possible outcome. It also made the navigation of a system far less daunting due to his attention and professionalism. I would have no hesitation in recommending Toner Legal and their services.”

Ann Cunningham

“I found Toner Legal while doing a google search and approached them in regards to a work related matter. I was put in touch with Adam Cooke who was a senior solicitor and Adam listened to my issue and advised the best way of dealing with this matter. Adam was very clear, honest and supportive with the advice he provided which in result got me a better resolution to the issue I had. The fees were very reasonable compared to other firms out there asking a lot more. I would not hesitate to recommend Toner Legal to anyone for any work related issues especially Adam. Really happy with the service.”

G S

“Blair Toner is an outstanding employment law resource. I have instructed him in every type of employment tribunal hearing and am always impressed by his level of preparation and service offered.”

- Chris Cook, Head of Employment, Partner.

“I had a long drawn out employment professional negligence claim which Blair took on. From start to finish I was extremely impressed by his professionalism and handling of a very difficult case. Blair handled the negotiations with my insurer, which was greatly appreciated. I received a final settlement which I was very pleased with,and I would highly recommend Blair and the Toner legal team.”

Graham W.