Unfair Dismissal Time Limit

Unfair Dismissal Time LimitIn this article, we cover the Unfair Dismissal Time Limit and clarify who is eligible to claim unfair dismissal. The ability to bring a claim in the employment tribunal is not always straightforward. Here are some of the key considerations.

Who has the right to claim Unfair Dismissal?

In general, this right is only available to employees who have been dismissed and have been employed for at least two years.

The two-year qualifying period does not apply in most cases where the dismissal is for an automatically unfair reason. If you have been dismissed with less than 2-years of service, there may be other claims that you can bring.

Further, there is no minimum service requirement for discrimination and whistleblowing claims. Therefore, employees and workers may still be able to bring claims if they are alleging that their dismissal was discriminatory or because there was a protected disclosure (whistleblowing).

If you have been dismissed, and have less than two years’ service, it would be prudent to take advice to understand if you can get the minimum service requirement. Further, you should also be aware of the unfair dismissal claim time limit, but good claims can be lost if you fall foul of the time limit.

What needs to be done before you can bring a claim?

Unfair Dismissal Time Limit

  • An employee considering making a claim in the employment tribunal must first contact Acas to register the claim for Acas Early Conciliation (EC). Their representative can also do this for them.
  • EC must be commenced before the expiry of the relevant time limit:
    • The time limit to bring a claim for unfair dismissal is 3 months less one day from the effective date of termination (when the employment ends).
    • The time limit to bring a claim for discrimination is 3 months less one day from the discriminatory act. It is often argued that the dismissal itself was a discriminatory act.
    • However, section 123(3)(a) of the Equality Act 2010 states that “where an act or acts of discrimination extend over a period (commonly referred to as a “continuing act”), they are treated as having occurred at the end of that period.” Therefore, time does not start to run until the end of the course of discriminatory conduct (if you can establish there was a continuing act).
    • The test for a “continuing act” is whether the employer is responsible for “an ongoing situation or a continuing state of affairs” in which the acts of discrimination occurred, as opposed to a series of unconnected or isolated incidents.
  • When EC is commenced, Acas will try to facilitate a settlement.
  • EC is scheduled to last 6 weeks but can be ended sooner (for example, if Acas determine there is no prospect of settlement being achieved).
  • If a Claimant refers the dispute to Acas for EC, there is an automatic extension of time for submitting a claim. Broadly speaking, time stops running when EC starts and begins to run again when EC ends. Acas produce a certificate showing the start and end dates of the EC. If EC is started with less than 1 month left of the original time limit to bring a claim, the time to bring a claim is extended to 1 calendar month from the date EC ends in any event.
  • If the Respondent commences EC, the time limit for bringing a claim is not extended.
  • When EC ends and Acas produce the EC Certificate, it includes the EC number which is needed when bringing a claim in the employment tribunal.

See our Employment Tribunal Time Limit Calculator for further information on time limits, which includes the unfair dismissal claim time limit.

Disclaimer:

This blog is for information purposes only. Nothing should be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice and nothing written should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship.

Get In Touch

Please call us on 0207 118 9218 or complete a Free Online Enquiry and we will be in touch.

“I would like to thank Adam, through the support of the firm, Toner Legal, for guiding me through the entire process. The communication, understanding and personable approach was second to none. I would highly recommend the firm’s legal representatives for providing outstanding services.”

Navrishi Gupta

“Highly recommend Blair Toner to anyone needing employment legal advice. Blair dealt with my case professionally, promptly and with a human approach. He was on the ball with my case, always kept me up to date as things progressed, and made sure I always understood what my options were, I was given all the information and guidance needed, which made the whole process a lot smoother. An extremely reliable and dedicated service, thank you again Blair!”

Lee Hatch

“Blair is a great Barrister that supported me to win a very difficult case that I had previously spent thousands of pounds with a solicitor before l contacted him directly. He went beyond the required duties to even support me in sourcing funding from external sources to enable me pay for the court fees. His own fees were so reasonable and l wished l met him at the beginning of this case which should have saved me a lot of money.

I really recommend his service to anyone as he is very good and will also be real with you.”

Patricia Obichukwu

“Blair Toner is an outstanding employment law resource. I have instructed him in every type of employment tribunal hearing and am always impressed by his level of preparation and service offered.”

- Chris Cook, Head of Employment, Partner.

“I have used the services of Toner Legal on two occasions. The service offered to me by Blair Toner was reassuring and with his expertise, guided me through an unfamiliar process ensuring I was involved at each stage. While I was going through my case, he would suggest things that I could read or listen to online that could assist me. His extensive employment law knowledge is a huge resource and it meant I would get the best possible outcome. It also made the navigation of a system far less daunting due to his attention and professionalism. I would have no hesitation in recommending Toner Legal and their services.”

- Ann Cunningham