Unfair Dismissal Time Limit

Unfair Dismissal Time LimitIn this article, we cover the Unfair Dismissal Time Limit and clarify who is eligible to claim unfair dismissal. The ability to bring a claim in the employment tribunal is not always straightforward. Here are some of the key considerations.

Who has the right to claim Unfair Dismissal?

In general, this right is only available to employees who have been dismissed and have been employed for at least two years.

The two-year qualifying period does not apply in most cases where the dismissal is for an automatically unfair reason. If you have been dismissed with less than 2-years of service, there may be other claims that you can bring.

Further, there is no minimum service requirement for discrimination and whistleblowing claims. Therefore, employees and workers may still be able to bring claims if they are alleging that their dismissal was discriminatory or because there was a protected disclosure (whistleblowing).

If you have been dismissed, and have less than two years’ service, it would be prudent to take advice to understand if you can get the minimum service requirement. Further, you should also be aware of the unfair dismissal claim time limit, but good claims can be lost if you fall foul of the time limit.

What needs to be done before you can bring a claim?

Unfair Dismissal Time Limit

  • An employee considering making a claim in the employment tribunal must first contact Acas to register the claim for Acas Early Conciliation (EC). Their representative can also do this for them.
  • EC must be commenced before the expiry of the relevant time limit:
    • The time limit to bring a claim for unfair dismissal is 3 months less one day from the effective date of termination (when the employment ends).
    • The time limit to bring a claim for discrimination is 3 months less one day from the discriminatory act. It is often argued that the dismissal itself was a discriminatory act.
    • However, section 123(3)(a) of the Equality Act 2010 states that “where an act or acts of discrimination extend over a period (commonly referred to as a “continuing act”), they are treated as having occurred at the end of that period.” Therefore, time does not start to run until the end of the course of discriminatory conduct (if you can establish there was a continuing act).
    • The test for a “continuing act” is whether the employer is responsible for “an ongoing situation or a continuing state of affairs” in which the acts of discrimination occurred, as opposed to a series of unconnected or isolated incidents.
  • When EC is commenced, Acas will try to facilitate a settlement.
  • EC is scheduled to last 6 weeks but can be ended sooner (for example, if Acas determine there is no prospect of settlement being achieved).
  • If a Claimant refers the dispute to Acas for EC, there is an automatic extension of time for submitting a claim. Broadly speaking, time stops running when EC starts and begins to run again when EC ends. Acas produce a certificate showing the start and end dates of the EC. If EC is started with less than 1 month left of the original time limit to bring a claim, the time to bring a claim is extended to 1 calendar month from the date EC ends in any event.
  • If the Respondent commences EC, the time limit for bringing a claim is not extended.
  • When EC ends and Acas produce the EC Certificate, it includes the EC number which is needed when bringing a claim in the employment tribunal.

See our Employment Tribunal Time Limit Calculator for further information on time limits, which includes the unfair dismissal claim time limit.

Disclaimer:

This blog is for information purposes only. Nothing should be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice and nothing written should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship.

Get In Touch

Please call us on 0207 118 9218 or complete a Free Online Enquiry and we will be in touch.

“Very good advice provided by Blair which enabled us to arrive at a satisfactory conclusion to an internal staffing dispute.”

Rob C

“Mr Toner provided me with an outstanding service throughout my long and difficult case. Always available to communicate with, he never ceased to amaze me with not only his extensive legal knowledge but also his patience/ ability to translate it into easily understandable English. To quote the opposing Barrister at the opening of my cross examination she described our Witness Statement as ‘forensic’ – needless to say we had a very successful outcome. If I had to sum up Mr Toner’s service in just one word – Outstanding – would be the only word I would need. I always felt he was at least one step ahead of the opposition and in the end that proved to be the case. Thank you Mr Toner.”

- Ian Lee

“I can honestly give Toner Legal a 5 star review and would highly recommend to anyone who has any employment issues. I wasn’t even sure I had a case and the advice and reassurance I was given was amazing. Blair is an amazing lawyer and will give you honest and informative advice. I ended up with a settlement better than I could’ve ever thought possible and keep the number saved incase there is anything I ever need legal advice and representation with in the future.”

Natalie Bone

“Excellent firm, I have no fault with the way they dealt and handled my case. If I struggled understanding anything, it would be explained and clarified. Would recommend to anyone 100% good at what they do.”

Robert Smith

“I was searching for legal advice and came across Toner Legal – I’m so happy I did I received such a professional and friendly service, they sorted out my employment issue, they were available when I needed to contact them and got back to me straight away with answers to my questions which I was really happy about I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend them.”

Jane Underdown