Constructive Unfair Dismissal

Constructive Unfair DismissalIf you are still employed, but are considering resigning because of treatment at work or the actions of your employer, please read this article carefully. We appreciate issues at work are very difficult to deal with and leaving may seem like your best option, but that is rarely the case. This is covered in more detail below.

We routinely help people that find themselves in a constructive dismissal situation and there are ways to make the best of a bad situation or fix the issues.

What is Constructive Dismissal?

Formally Constructive Unfair Dismissal, falls within the definition of a dismissal under section 95(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996:

It is defined as arising where the employee terminates their employment contract, with or without notice, in circumstances in which they are entitled to terminate it without notice by reason of the employer’s conduct.

The key difference between “unfair dismissal” is that with constructive dismissal the employee resigns and with an unfair dismissal the employer dismisses the employee. In a constructive dismissal claim, the burden of proof is on the employee, in an unfair dismissal claim, the burden of proof is on the employer.

The phrase constructive dismissal is not referred to in statute (in this case the Employment Rights Act 1996) but is a colloquial label.

Constructive dismissal is a complex area and what is set out below is a brief introduction.

Who can claim Constructive Dismissal?

To be eligible to claim constructive dismissal:

  • You must be an employee
  • Have at least 2 years continuous service
  • Unless one of the exceptions apply, known as automatically unfair dismissals.

When is there a Constructive Unfair Dismissal?

The following elements are needed to establish constructive dismissal.

(1) A fundamental breach of contract (also known as a repudiatory breach). This can be an actual or anticipatory breach” and can arise from a single act or a series of act. It must be sufficiently serious to justify the employee resigning. Some common examples are:

  • Failure to pay.
  • Failure to provide a safe working environment.
  • Changes to your working terms and conditions.
  • Not adequately dealing with a grievance.
  • A demotion.
  • Constant unfair criticism or demeaning behavior.
  • Bullying or discriminating or turning a blind eye to this conduct.

(2) The employee must accept there was a breach and treat the contract as ended. The employee must resign in response to the breach.

(3) The employee must not delay too long or they may be deemed to have waived or “affirmed” the breach. The period of acceptable delay depends on the overall circumstances and nature of the alleged breach.

In summary, there must be a fundamental breach of contract, that causes an employee (with 2 years’ service, unless an exception applies) to resign, and they don’t delay too long before resigning.

What should I do if I think my employer has committed a fundamental breach of contract?

Don’t resign. Take advice. Act quickly.

This sounds counterintuitive, because to preserve the constructive unfair dismissal claim, you must resign and do so quickly. Taking too long to receive professional advice may not be sufficient to justify the delay in resigning.

However, (1) you need to make sure the employer’s conduct was serious enough to amount to a fundamental breach of contract and (2) even if it was, you are in a much better position to negotiate if you remain employed.

If you resign first, then take advice and obtain representation, it is still difficult to obtain compensation when the employee has left the business without first presenting a Tribunal claim (the main downside here (the Tribunal route), is it can take a long time (potentially years), and potentially lots of effort and money before you receive compensation – you may also lose the claim and be awarded nothing).

If you remain employed then take advice and obtain representation, you will (generally) be in a much stronger position to negotiate an exit, meaning you can obtain compensation quickly without the need (and associated risks) to present a Tribunal claim.

As said (although it bears repeating), you must act quickly, because if you wait too long, you run the risk of losing the constructive unfair dismissal claim (see above, if you wait too long, you may waive the fundamental breach of contract).

Are there any other Tips when potentially faced with a Constructive Dismissal?

  • As said above, but worth repeating – don’t resign, take advice, do so quickly. There are potential ways to buy time so you can keep your options open, which can be explored if you take advice.
  • Before taking advice, have your evidence ready.
  • In terms of evidence, keep detailed notes/documentary evidence of the treatment that you think is a fundamental breach of contract, but don’t breach any internal rules/terms of your contract in the process (for example, forwarding emails from your work email to your personal email may seem like a good idea, but this may lead to disciplinary action).
  • Decide if you want to stay employed or exit the business.
  • If you want to stay, you can take advice / consider how best to resolve the issue.
  • If you want to leave, you can take advice on how to exit on the best terms possible.

If you are having issues at work, these articles may help you:

    1. Having Issues at Work – Things to Consider
    2. How to Address Concerns at Work

Disclaimer:

This blog is for information purposes only. Nothing should be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice and nothing written should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship.

Get In Touch

Please call us on 0207 118 9218 or complete a Free Online Enquiry and we will be in touch.

“Very good advice provided by Blair which enabled us to arrive at a satisfactory conclusion to an internal staffing dispute.”

Rob C

“Earlier this year I had a situation where my ex employer refused to pay what was owed after leaving the employment. The sum owed was in the region of £5000 and I was recommended Blair Toner. From the very first introduction and conversation of the problem, Blair guided me through the process of ‘Small Claims’ and linked me with the necessary forms etc. After winning judgement, still no payment happened. Blair then guided me through the process of appointing Court Baliffs and that resulted in the debt being paid in full. I personally would recommend Toner Legal and in fact Blair has since sorted a similar problem my son had experienced to my son’s total satisfaction.”

Alan Edward Goodes

“Excellent firm, I have no fault with the way they dealt and handled my case. If I struggled understanding anything, it would be explained and clarified. Would recommend to anyone 100% good at what they do.”

Robert Smith

“Mr Toner provided me with an outstanding service throughout my long and difficult case. Always available to communicate with, he never ceased to amaze me with not only his extensive legal knowledge but also his patience/ ability to translate it into easily understandable English. To quote the opposing Barrister at the opening of my cross examination she described our Witness Statement as ‘forensic’ – needless to say we had a very successful outcome. If I had to sum up Mr Toner’s service in just one word – Outstanding – would be the only word I would need. I always felt he was at least one step ahead of the opposition and in the end that proved to be the case. Thank you Mr Toner.”

- Ian Lee

“A fantastic, professional experience working with Blair. He provided us with legal expertise to help us achieve a successful resolution.”

Lee